Skip to content
Home » Mediation Process: Bringing Harmony in Conflict

Can A Father-In-Law Force Daughter-In-Law to Reside in Matrimonial Home


The dynamics and expectations between in-laws and daughter-in-law in Indian society can vary widely depending on cultural, regional, and individual factors. There is no universal set of rights or obligations that apply to all relationships. However, some general aspects are often considered in traditional Indian families revolve around Respect, Support, Contribution, Adaptability, Harmony and very importantly the expectation is to look after the in-laws as her own parents.

In today’s global work culture, there shall be situations, where a husband’s work requires frequent international travel, and the expectation is for the wife to reside with her in-laws, this reflects a unique family dynamic.

It’s important to note that societal expectations are evolving, and many families today are more progressive and supportive of individual choices and independence. Additionally, the dynamics can vary significantly from one family to another. Modern Indian families may place a higher value on the autonomy and choices of daughters-in-law, and there is a growing recognition of the importance of mutual respect and understanding within the family unit but many in-laws expect the daughter-in-law to reside with them in the absence of her husband.

The decision of a daughter-in-law to reside with her parents rather than her in-laws during her husband’s extended periods of travel for work is a personal choice influenced by a variety of factors. In such circumstances, the daughter-in-law may find comfort and support in the familiar surroundings of her parental home, where she may have established a strong emotional connection. This choice could also be driven by practical considerations, as staying with her own family may offer additional assistance with daily responsibilities, especially if there are children involved. The decision underscores the importance of individual autonomy within a marriage, recognizing that each partner may have unique needs and preferences. As societal norms evolve, such decisions reflect the diversity of family dynamics and the acknowledgment of the importance of personal choices within the context of marital relationships.


“In the case of Aarfa Bano v State of U.P., 2023 SCC OnLine All 231, the Father-In-Law approached the Hon’ble High Court filing a writ of Habeas Corpus with the prayer that his daughter-in-law, is in illegal custody of her parents, thus, her custody be given to him as her parents are not allowing her to go to her matrimonial house…”

Habeas Corpus refers to a legal principle that protects an individual’s right to personal liberty and prevents unlawful or arbitrary detention. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal order that requires a person who is detained to be brought before a court or judge. The purpose of this writ is to ensure that the detainee is not being held without proper legal authority.

The court emphasized nature of marriage, outlining the husband’s legal obligations to provide protection, shelter, and meet the day-to-day needs of his wife. The specific case involves a woman detained or confined, whose husband is residing and earning a living in Kuwait. The court asserts that the wife is not in illegal detention, as she has chosen to live with her parents, while her husband is away. The court rejects the notion that the wife’s residence with her parents constitutes illegal detention, suggesting that her choice to stay with her parents might be voluntary, possibly due to her husband’s absence.

The Court emphasised that even if there is any grievance, the husband has remedy to approach before appropriate forum, but not the father-in-law, as he has no locus at all. This underscores the principle that any grievances related to the marriage should be addressed through the appropriate legal channels, with the husband having the right to approach the relevant forum rather than involving the father-in-law, who is deemed to have no legal standing in this matter.

In India, all matrimonial disputes are first addressed at the Family Court, unless the orders are not favourable to either party, they can knock the doors of higher courts. Family courts play a crucial role in handling matrimonial disputes, which involve legal conflicts arising within the context of marriage. The primary goal of family courts in matrimonial disputes is to provide a fair and just resolution while considering the well-being of all parties involved, especially any children. The procedures and specific laws governing matrimonial disputes may vary across jurisdictions, but family courts generally serve as the legal forum for addressing issues arising from marital relationships.

Feel free to write to us at mail@lawyersonia.com or call +91 9845944896 if you wish to consult or discuss your matter. “Sonia and Partners” is a Boutique law firm led by Adv. Sonia Rajesh supported by a team of qualified and among the Best Lawyers in Bangalore practicing in the area of Family Law and Criminal defence serving Citizens of India, Overseas Indians, NRIs and Global International Clients.

    REQUEST A CONSULTATION